Our work has revealed a significant discrepancy. Students said they preferred and performed better when reading on screens. But their actual performance tended to suffer.
For example, from our review of research done since 1992, we found that students were able to better comprehend information in print for texts that were more than a page in length. This appears to be related to the disruptive effect that scrolling has on comprehension.
Across the studies, the texts differed in length, and we collected varying data (e.g., reading time). Nonetheless, some key findings emerged that shed new light on the differences between reading printed and digital content:
-
Students overwhelming preferred to read digitally.
-
Reading was significantly faster online than in print.
-
Students judged their comprehension as better online than in print.
-
Paradoxically, overall comprehension was better for print versus digital reading.
-
The medium didn’t matter for general questions (like understanding the main idea of the text).
-
But when it came to specific questions, comprehension was significantly better when participants read printed texts.
You can read more on Business Insider here.
Oct. 15, 2017