Skip to content
Menu
DEVICES DIVIDE
  • home
    • “If we continue to develop our technology without wisdom or prudence, our servant may prove to be our executioner.” -Omar N. Bradley
  • podcast (new!)
    • Sara Negrin: A Screen-Loving High-Schooler’s Perspective on the Digital Era
    • Chris Kresser: A Father with a Functional Medicine Perspective on Digital Technology
    • Max Stossel: on the Center for Humane Technology and Teen Screen-Time
    • Sybil Kelly: Marketer, Mother, and Author of “Get the F**ck Off That Screen” Talks About Parenting with Screens
    • Ethan Zuckerman: An MIT Associate Professor Using Digital Media for Social Change
    • Olivia June: Hey! VINA’s Founder Uses Screens to Maximize Connections
    • Jerry Mander: An Author and Environmental Activist’s Cautionary Take on our Obsession with Screens
  • my writings
    • Study on Bay Area High Schoolers With and Without Smartphones: Measures Productivity Doing Homework and Anxiety
    • An Apple A Day Keeps My Parents Away
    • I am addicted to my phone, so what?
    • iPhone Contract
    • The Kaminskis: a Tale of iPhone Tragedy
  • articles
    • Study on Bay Area High Schoolers With and Without Smartphones: Measures Productivity Doing Homework and Anxiety
    • 10 girls. 14 days without any social media. Here’s how they fared.
    • 60 Minutes: Groundbreaking NIH Study Examines Effects of Screen Time on Kids
    • Human Contact Is Now a Luxury Good
    • This Friendship Has Been Digitized
    • France has banned all children under 15 from using their phones in school
    • Do Not Disturb: How I Ditched My Phone and Unbroke My Brain
    • Tristan Harris: The Manipulative Tricks Tech Companies Use To Capture Your Attention
    • States Consider Longer School Recess, and the Adults Aren’t Complaining
    • Stanford’s “Just How Bad Is Kids’ Smartphone Addiction?”
    • A company that will pay you $100,000 to ditch your smartphone for a year
    • New York Times: “This Is Your Brain Off Facebook.”
    • “Six Screen-Time Studies That Changed My Parenting Approach”
    • “Steve Jobs Never Wanted Us to Use Our iPhones Like This”
    • “A Dark Consensus About Screens and Kids Begins to Emerge in Silicon Valley”
    • Silicon Valley Nannies are Phone Police for Kids
    • The Digital Gap Between Rich and Poor Kids Is Not What We Expected
    • Limiting children’s recreational screen time to less than two hours a day linked to better cognition, study finds
    • Students learn way more effectively from print textbooks than screens
    • HOPELAB Study Reveals Some Positive Effects of Social Media
    • How Is Your Phone Changing You? The video.
    • Phones Are Making Teens Better Behaved and Less Hedonistic
    • How texting effects conversations, or does it…
    • Dumb phones are now “hip”
    • Kids aren’t the only ones who need screen-time limits
    • This is what we need in CA
    • bookless libraries
  • resources
    • Study on Bay Area High Schoolers With and Without Smartphones: Measures Productivity Doing Homework and Anxiety
    • podcast!
    • Screen-time Tracking
    • Tech Talk Tuesday
    • iPhone Contract
    • super cool books
    • things to do instead of being on your phone
    • Sherry Turkle’s TED talk
  • humor
    • very funny comics
    • happy holidays!!
    • This is what we need in CA
    • pictures
      • parents…
  • about me
    • contact
DEVICES DIVIDE

Students learn way more effectively from print textbooks than screens

Posted on January 5, 2019January 6, 2019 by KaiaRae

Our work has revealed a significant discrepancy. Students said they preferred and performed better when reading on screens. But their actual performance tended to suffer.

For example, from our review of research done since 1992, we found that students were able to better comprehend information in print for texts that were more than a page in length. This appears to be related to the disruptive effect that scrolling has on comprehension.

Across the studies, the texts differed in length, and we collected varying data (e.g., reading time). Nonetheless, some key findings emerged that shed new light on the differences between reading printed and digital content:

  • Students overwhelming preferred to read digitally.

  • Reading was significantly faster online than in print.

  • Students judged their comprehension as better online than in print.

  • Paradoxically, overall comprehension was better for print versus digital reading.

  • The medium didn’t matter for general questions (like understanding the main idea of the text).

  • But when it came to specific questions, comprehension was significantly better when participants read printed texts.

You can read more on Business Insider here.

Oct. 15, 2017

Share this to spread awareness!

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Contact

the.device.divide@gmail.com

Search

Archives

©2025 DEVICES DIVIDE | Powered by Superb Themes
%d